ACADEMIC COUNSEL

Northwestern University
School of Law
J.D., 1988
cum laude

University of Arizona
B.A. English with
High Honors, 1984
Phi Beta Kappa

Assistant Professor of Law
Walter F. George School of Law
Mercer University
2002-present

Visiting Professor of Law
University of Houston
2004

Adjunct Professor of Law
University of Texas
School of Law
1999-2001

Admitted to Practice
Texas, 1988
Georgia, 2006



Printer Friendly Version

DAVID HRICIK

dhricik@yetterwarden.com  |   713.632.8000   |     vCard


David Hricik is a Professor of Law with the Walter F. George School of Law, Mercer University, in Macon, Georgia. The Firm consults with him on matters concerning legal malpractice, intellectual property, federal civil procedure, and complex commercial litigation.

He is a past chair of the Ethics and Professionalism Committee of the American Intellectual Property Law Association, as well as the Professionalism and Ethics Committee of the Intellectual Property Section of the American Bar Association. Professor Hricik was the Chair for 2002-2003 of the Ethics Committee of the Intellectual Property Section of the American Bar Association; a member of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Committee of the Texas State Bar in 1997-2002; a member of the Drafting Subcommittee of the TDRPCC in 1999-2002; a member of the Special Joint Subcommittee which drafted the Texas advertising rules regulating the Internet; a member of the Texas Appellate Lawyer's Creed Drafting Committee in 1998; chair of the Amicus Brief Committee of the Houston Intellectual Property Law Association in 1995-1996; and a member of the Editorial Review Board Jurimetrics in 1997-2000.

Professor Hricik is an accomplished author and has written numerous books and articles, including Property: Cases, Documents, and Lawyering Strategies (2008) (Casebook, co-authored with Professors Crump & Caudill); Modern Statutory Interpretation (2006) (Carolina Academic Press, co-authored with Professor Jellum); Trouble Waiting to Happen: Malpractice and Ethical Issues in Patent Prosecution, 31 Am. Intell. Prop. L. Q.J. 387 (2003); Wrong About Everything: Application by the District Courts of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b) to Inequitable Conduct, 86 Marquette L. Rev. 895 (2003); Aerial Boundaries: The Duty of Candor as a Limitation on the Duty of Patent Practitioners to Advocate for Maximum Patent Coverage, 44 So. Tex. L. Rev. 205 (2002); and Lawyers Worry Too Much About Transmitting Client Confidences by Internet E-mail, 11 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 459 (1998).

He is admitted to practice in Texas, Georgia, the United States Supreme Court, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.